Loss aversion under pressure Analyzing decision-making in high-stakes tennis through Grand Slam big data

Main Article Content

Wonyong Kim
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2085-1282
Seokjun Jeong
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0553-8350
Jinho Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8840-6974

Abstract

This study examines loss aversion behaviour in professional tennis, with a focus on players’ responses to high-stakes situations such as game points and break points. While prior research has provided valuable insights, it has predominantly relied on limited match samples, often confined to select tournaments or individual players. To address this limitation and enhance the generalizability of findings, the present study employs a comprehensive dataset comprising ten years (2010–2020) of five-set matches from all four Grand Slam tournaments. Anchored in Prospect Theory—which suggests that individuals are more motivated to avoid losses than to acquire equivalent gains—the analysis investigates key performance indicators including scoring success rate, serve ace rate, and double fault frequency. The results indicate that players exhibit loss-averse behaviour in specific contexts, notably by reducing double faults during break points. However, other performance metrics, such as ace rates and serve accuracy, do not consistently reflect loss-averse tendencies. A post-hoc analysis based on point differentials further elucidates the nuanced manifestations of loss aversion across varying match contexts. These findings contribute to a more robust understanding of risk-related decision-making in elite sports and offer implications for performance optimization and athlete management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

Author Biographies

Seokjun Jeong, Swiss School of Management

Department of AI and Big Data.

Jinho Kim, Swiss School of Management

Department of AI and Big Data.

How to Cite

Kim, W., Jeong, S., & Kim, J. (2025). Loss aversion under pressure: Analyzing decision-making in high-stakes tennis through Grand Slam big data. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise , 21(1), 284-298. https://doi.org/10.55860/tdfb7122

References

Anbarci, N., Arin, K. P., Kuhlenkasper, T., & Zenker, C. (2018). Revisiting loss aversion: Evidence from professional tennis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 153, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.10.014

Anbarci, N., Arin, K. P., Okten, C., & Zenker, C. (2017). Is Roger Federer more loss averse than Serena Williams? Applied Economics, 49(35), 3546-3559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1262527

Anderson, A., & Green, E. A. (2018). Personal bests as reference points. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(8), 1772-1776. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706530115

Apesteguia, J., & Palacios-Huerta, I. (2010). Psychological pressure in competitive environments: Evidence from a randomized natural experiment. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2548-2564. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.5.2548

Cary, M., & Stephens, H. (2023). Gendered consequences of COVID-19 among professional tennis players. Journal of Sports Eco-nomics, 24(2), 241-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025221120591

Elmore, R., & Urbaczewski, A. (2021). Loss aversion in professional golf. Journal of Sports Economics, 22(2), 202-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002520967403

Greve, H. R., Rudi, N., & Walvekar, A. (2021). Rational fouls? Loss aversion on organizational and individual goals influence decision quality. Organization Studies, 42(7), 1031-1051. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619878462

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 363-391. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I (pp. 99-127). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0006

Kowalik, Z., & Lewandowski, P. (2021). The gender gap in aversion to COVID-19 exposure: Evidence from professional tennis. PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0249045. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249045

Krawczyk, M. (2019). Unforced Errors: Tennis serve data tells us little about loss aversion. Econ Journal Watch, 16(1), 114.

Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2008). Homo economicus evolves. Science, 319(5865), 909-910. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1153640

List, J. A. (2003). Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 41-71. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535144

Liu, J., Huang, S., Xu, H., Li, D., Zhong, N., & Liu, H. (2021). Cooperation promotion from the perspective of behavioral economics: An incentive mechanism based on loss aversion in vehicular Ad-Hoc networks. Electronics, 10(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030225

Lowrance, M., Miller, J., & Price, J. (2020). Game, set, match and loss aversion in tennis. In Outcome Uncertainty in Sporting Events (pp. 51-62). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839102172.00009

Mallard, G. (2016). Loss aversion and decision fatigue at the Wimbledon tennis championship. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 6(1), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBAF.2016.079880

Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., & Gilovich, T. (1995). When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 603. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.603

Pawlowski, T. (2021). Reference point behavior and sports. In Behavioural Sports Economics (pp. 172-185). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003080824-12

Pope, D. G., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2011). Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. American Economic Review, 101(1), 129-157. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.1.129

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.